Group J: Clear Entry & Exit Criteria
Participants: Debbie Armendariz, Jeff Brown, Bob Goldman, Dan Havran, & Cameron Neal
Problem Statement: The lack of clear entry/exit criteria
- Creates a lack of goal and objectives for progress and placement change.
- Not recognizing when LRE is appropriate and inappropriate
- Placement options are not defined criteria, known locations, curriculum, staffing.
Working Well:
- Placement
- School Focus
- Grade range SLC
- Functional grade range
- Quarterly reviews by team
Does Not Exist/Working Poorly:
- Brochure/Matrix: there is no publication (written or online on PPS website) which provides a clear description of all placement options which includes a characterization of the specific placement and criteria for entry and exit of the specific placement. The description should also include all of the items listed in this heading.
- Staffing descriptions, number of paraeducators, therapists, etc.
- Curriculum Description
- School Name / Location SLC - so that parents can see if an appropriate placement is in their local neighborhood.
- School Focus
- Relevant Service at school - would include services available at the specific placement.
e.g., sensory rooms. - Grade range. (ie- 3-5)
- Quarterly Reviews by School Team
- Family Advocate.
Recommendation: Upon entry into an SLC, develop individualized exit criteria/ expected timeline.
- Provide specific evidence based target for exiting the program to a less restrictive environment.
- Quarterly report on movement toward target submitted to building administrator for accountability. (“Plan For Discharge”)
Recommendation: Define entry and exit criteria for SLC rooms.
- General Checklist for exit and entry to SPED and SLC
- Individual Quarterly report submitted to building admin for accountability.
(review criteria)
< Previous: Group I: Equity in Staffing Based on Needs Next: Group K: Vocational Options & Transition >
